linksunten.indymedia kündigt baldige Rückkehr mit “Unabhängigkeitserklärung des Cyberspace” an

Screenshot Indymedia.linksunten

Stilsicher mit einem Auszug aus der 1996 vom Tech-Libertären und EFF-Mitgründer John Perry Barlow verkündeten Unabhängigkeitserklärung des Cyberspace kündigt indymedia.linksunten seine baldige Rückkehr an. Das Nachrichtenportal war gestern von Bundesinnenminister Thomas de Maizière (CDU) wegen der Veröffentlichung verfassungsfeindlicher und zu Gewalt aufrufender Inhalte verboten worden.  Die Homepage der Seite war gestern zeitweise nicht zu erreichen.

Die auf  der Wirtschaftskonferenz in Davos von Barlow vorgetragene Unabhängigkeitserklärung richtete sich  gegen schon damals aufkommenden Versuche der Staaten, das Internet zu zensieren. Teile der fast 20 Jahre alten Erklärung wirken daher wie heute geschrieben:

In China, Deutschland, Frankreich, Rußland, Singapur, Italien und den USA versucht Ihr, den Virus der Freiheit abzuwehren, indem Ihr Wachposten an den Grenzen des Cyberspace postiert. Sie werden die Seuche für eine Weile eindämmen können, aber sie werden ohnmächtig sein in einer Welt, die schon bald von digitalen Medien umspannt sein wird.

Governments of the Industrial World, you weary giants of flesh and steel, I come from Cyberspace, the new home of Mind. On behalf of the future, I ask you of the past to leave us alone. You are not welcome among us. You have no sovereignty where we gather.

We have no elected government, nor are we likely to have one, so I address you with no greater authority than that with which liberty itself always speaks. I declare the global social space we are building to be naturally independent of the tyrannies you seek to impose on us. You have no moral right to rule us nor do you possess any methods of enforcement we have true reason to fear.

Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed. You have neither solicited nor received ours. We did not invite you. You do not know us, nor do you know our world. Cyberspace does not lie within your borders. Do not think that you can build it, as though it were a public construction project. You cannot. It is an act of nature and it grows itself through our collective actions.

You have not engaged in our great and gathering conversation, nor did you create the wealth of our marketplaces. You do not know our culture, our ethics, or the unwritten codes that already provide our society more order than could be obtained by any of your impositions.

You claim there are problems among us that you need to solve. You use this claim as an excuse to invade our precincts. Many of these problems don’t exist. Where there are real conflicts, where there are wrongs, we will identify them and address them by our means. We are forming our own Social Contract. This governance will arise according to the conditions of our world, not yours. Our world is different.

Cyberspace consists of transactions, relationships, and thought itself, arrayed like a standing wave in the web of our communications. Ours is a world that is both everywhere and nowhere, but it is not where bodies live.

We are creating a world that all may enter without privilege or prejudice accorded by race, economic power, military force, or station of birth.

We are creating a world where anyone, anywhere may express his or her beliefs, no matter how singular, without fear of being coerced into silence or conformity.

Your legal concepts of property, expression, identity, movement, and context do not apply to us. They are all based on matter, and there is no matter here.

Our identities have no bodies, so, unlike you, we cannot obtain order by physical coercion. We believe that from ethics, enlightened self-interest, and the commonweal, our governance will emerge. Our identities may be distributed across many of your jurisdictions. The only law that all our constituent cultures would generally recognize is the Golden Rule. We hope we will be able to build our particular solutions on that basis. But we cannot accept the solutions you are attempting to impose.

In the United States, you have today created a law, the Telecommunications Reform Act, which repudiates your own Constitution and insults the dreams of Jefferson, Washington, Mill, Madison, DeToqueville, and Brandeis. These dreams must now be born anew in us.

You are terrified of your own children, since they are natives in a world where you will always be immigrants. Because you fear them, you entrust your bureaucracies with the parental responsibilities you are too cowardly to confront yourselves. In our world, all the sentiments and expressions of humanity, from the debasing to the angelic, are parts of a seamless whole, the global conversation of bits. We cannot separate the air that chokes from the air upon which wings beat.

In China, Germany, France, Russia, Singapore, Italy and the United States, you are trying to ward off the virus of liberty by erecting guard posts at the frontiers of Cyberspace. These may keep out the contagion for a small time, but they will not work in a world that will soon be blanketed in bit-bearing media.

Your increasingly obsolete information industries would perpetuate themselves by proposing laws, in America and elsewhere, that claim to own speech itself throughout the world. These laws would declare ideas to be another industrial product, no more noble than pig iron. In our world, whatever the human mind may create can be reproduced and distributed infinitely at no cost. The global conveyance of thought no longer requires your factories to accomplish.

These increasingly hostile and colonial measures place us in the same position as those previous lovers of freedom and self-determination who had to reject the authorities of distant, uninformed powers. We must declare our virtual selves immune to your sovereignty, even as we continue to consent to your rule over our bodies. We will spread ourselves across the Planet so that no one can arrest our thoughts.

We will create a civilization of the Mind in Cyberspace. May it be more humane and fair than the world your governments have made before.

Davos, Switzerland
February 8, 1996


6 Kommentare

Die frische Bergluft der winterlichen Alpen mag freiheitliche Urtriebe fördern, es hat aber natürlich Gründe, dass es funktionsfähige Staaten gibt.
Ein anderer Strukturierungsentwurf, der eher begann und heute noch in gescheiterten Staaten zu finden ist, sind Gruppen/Familien/Clanstrukturen mit ihren eigenen Regeln. Wie sie funktionieren erleben wir auch hier immer mehr.

Was soll der Quatsch bgzl. Freiheit etc. Beim Verstoß gegen Menschenrechte etc. muss ein Staat eingreifen bzw. im Extremfall auch die Staatengemeinschaft.

Offen ist nur, warum aktuell keine konsequenten Grenzen gezogen werden. Dass der Staat bei strafbaren Handlungen reagieren muss, ist klar. Er hat irgendwie aber keine klare Linie und versucht, staatliche Aufgaben via Outsourcing loszuwerden. Das ist der falsche Weg.

Unser Duo Maas/de Maziere ist aus meiner Sicht einfach zu oft auf dem falschen Weg und hat keine Linie. Es bleibt zu hoffen, dass bald neue Kräfte Akzente setzen können.,

Seltsamerweise haben die Sicherheitsbehörden in Deutschland keine Handhabe gegen die Partei Die Rechte und deren Hetzmedium dortmundecho ,obwohl sich deren Dortmunder Vorsitzender und Ratsvertreter Michael Brück genüsslich Originalzitate von Adolf Hitler zueigen macht und diese im Rat der Stadt Dortmund zum Abschluss einer von ihm gehaltenen Rede zum Besten gibt,

Auch der Internet-Versandhandel von Brück unter der Domäne würde nicht von den Behörden, sondern von Netzbetreiber vom Netz genommen.

Kommentar verfassen